A C++ class deriving from a template — `class Derived : public Base<int>`,
a CRTP base `class App : public CRTPBase<App>`, a struct inheriting a
template, or a templated base mixed into a multi-base clause — recorded its
base as the full instantiation text (`Base<int>`). That never name-matched
the template, which is indexed as the bare node `Base`, so the `extends`
edge never resolved and the derived class looked like it inherited from
nothing — callers/impact analysis stopped at the boundary.
Strip the template arguments from the base-type reference name in the
`base_class_clause` handler via a new `stripCppTemplateArgs` helper: it
removes every balanced `<…>` group (any nesting/position), so `Base<int>`
→ `Base` and `ns::Tpl<int>` → `ns::Tpl`. The remaining qualified head is
exactly what the non-templated base case already produces, so resolution
treats templated and non-templated bases identically; a name with no
template args passes through unchanged.
Covers same-file and same-namespace bases (the dominant real-world
patterns). A base in a different namespace referenced with its qualifier
(`other_ns::Tpl<int>`) still doesn't resolve, but that's a pre-existing,
orthogonal namespace-resolution gap — the non-templated `other_ns::Plain`
fails identically — not a template issue.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
f4e03e9cdc