Two permanent fixtures pinning the failure mode from issue #1500 — explore spending its byte envelope on files that merely name-collide with the query. BOTH FAIL TODAY, by design: they document the bug and become the pass gate for CG-10 (scoring) + CG-12 (proportional allocation). __tests__/fixtures/payroll-go/ — a synthetic Go service mirroring the reporter's shape: generated FKIT CRUD beside a hand-written payroll use-case, entered from an HTTP route. Half the generated tree carries ORDINARY names detectable only by their `// Code generated ... DO NOT EDIT.` header (the #1500 case, and end-to-end cover for CG-5); `payrollpb/*.pb.go` covers the path-detectable channel. BuildPayslip, Upsert and Store each exist twice, generated and hand-written. cycle.go sits above the whole-file window so it clips; the generated files sit below it so they ship whole. Asking "how does payroll cycle create and calculate payslips?" — naming none of the answering symbols — the generated CRUD delivers 57.4% of the envelope against the hand-written layer's 25.6%, all of the latter domain types. cycle.go is allocated the single largest slice (30.6%) and delivers ZERO: the hard ceiling drops its whole section. runPayrollCycleAll, the hand-written BuildPayslip and the real Upsert never reach the agent. The second fixture is this repo, "how does explore allocate its output budget across files", where scripts/agent-eval/*.mjs take 71.8% against tools.ts's 18.5% despite scoring 4.6x lower. It reads the live index, so its assertions are relative rather than fixed percentages. - scripts/agent-eval/probe-allocation.mjs — per-file budget-share probe, driving the CG-4 diagnostic through a JSONL sidecar so it measures the shipping allocator. Fixture entries are hermetic (copy + re-index per run, verified byte-identical across runs); exits 1 while any assertion fails. - scripts/agent-eval/allocation-fixtures.json — both fixtures declared, with the 2026-08-03 baselines. - __tests__/explore-allocation-1500.test.ts — fixture-shape assertions green today; the allocation assertions held as `it.fails` so the suite stays green while the bug is open and goes RED the moment it is fixed. Also documented and deliberately left unfixed: runPayrollCycleAll's `s.store.Upsert` edge resolves to the GENERATED Store.Upsert, not the hand-written one — same-name method resolution across two packages picks the wrong receiver. It is upstream of the allocation bug, so it belongs with CG-10's scoring work. Refs #1500 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
257 lines
12 KiB
TypeScript
257 lines
12 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* Regression fixture for GitHub issue #1500 / epic CG-1 — relevance-proportional
|
|
* explore budget allocation.
|
|
*
|
|
* The reporter's repo is a Go service whose GENERATED FKIT CRUD layer sits beside
|
|
* the hand-written use-case that does the real work. Asking an architecture
|
|
* question that doesn't name the exact use-case ("how does payroll cycle create
|
|
* and calculate payslips?") spends the explore envelope on the generated CRUD,
|
|
* because the generated layer name-collides on every term in the question while
|
|
* the hand-written workflow is one big file that gets clipped.
|
|
*
|
|
* `__tests__/fixtures/payroll-go/` reproduces that shape permanently. This suite
|
|
* is in two halves:
|
|
*
|
|
* 1. **Fixture shape** — green today. These pin the properties the fixture must
|
|
* keep for the gate below to mean anything: the generated/hand-written split
|
|
* (including the ordinary-named generated files only a CONTENT header betrays,
|
|
* which is the #1500 case), the deliberate name collisions, and the
|
|
* runPayrollCycleAll → BuildPayslip → Upsert chain resolving end-to-end. If
|
|
* the fixture rots, these fail first and say so.
|
|
*
|
|
* 2. **Budget allocation** — the gate, written with `it.fails` because it
|
|
* DOCUMENTS A BUG THAT IS STILL OPEN. Vitest passes an `it.fails` test only
|
|
* while its body throws, so the suite is green today and goes RED the moment
|
|
* allocation is fixed (CG-10 scoring + CG-12 proportional bytes).
|
|
* **When it goes red, delete the `.fails` — do not delete the test.**
|
|
*
|
|
* The same assertions run outside vitest, against the built dist and with the
|
|
* full CG-4 per-file diagnostic, via `node scripts/agent-eval/probe-allocation.mjs`
|
|
* (declared in `scripts/agent-eval/allocation-fixtures.json`).
|
|
*/
|
|
import { describe, it, expect, beforeAll, afterAll } from 'vitest';
|
|
import * as fs from 'fs';
|
|
import * as path from 'path';
|
|
import * as os from 'os';
|
|
import CodeGraph from '../src/index';
|
|
import { ToolHandler } from '../src/mcp/tools';
|
|
import { attributeSourceBytes } from '../src/mcp/explore-diagnostics';
|
|
import { isGeneratedFile, hasGeneratedHeader } from '../src/extraction/generated-detection';
|
|
|
|
const FIXTURE_SRC = path.join(__dirname, 'fixtures', 'payroll-go');
|
|
|
|
/** The question a newcomer asks — names none of the symbols that answer it. */
|
|
const QUERY = 'how does payroll cycle create and calculate payslips?';
|
|
|
|
/** The hand-written workflow: what the query is actually about. */
|
|
const ANSWER_PREFIXES = [
|
|
'internal/usecase/',
|
|
'internal/store/',
|
|
'internal/transport/',
|
|
'internal/domain/',
|
|
'cmd/',
|
|
];
|
|
/** The generated CRUD/DTO layer: what wins the envelope today. */
|
|
const GENERATED_PREFIX = 'internal/gen/';
|
|
|
|
const startsWithAny = (p: string, prefixes: string[]) => prefixes.some((x) => p.startsWith(x));
|
|
|
|
describe('#1500 — generated Go CRUD beside a hand-written payroll workflow', () => {
|
|
let testDir: string;
|
|
let cg: CodeGraph;
|
|
let handler: ToolHandler;
|
|
let response: string;
|
|
/** Delivered source bytes per file, attributed from the final response. */
|
|
let bytes: Map<string, number>;
|
|
|
|
beforeAll(async () => {
|
|
testDir = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'codegraph-1500-'));
|
|
fs.cpSync(FIXTURE_SRC, testDir, { recursive: true });
|
|
// A stray index in the checked-in tree would be copied in and reused.
|
|
fs.rmSync(path.join(testDir, '.codegraph'), { recursive: true, force: true });
|
|
|
|
cg = CodeGraph.initSync(testDir);
|
|
await cg.indexAll();
|
|
handler = new ToolHandler(cg);
|
|
|
|
const result = await handler.execute('codegraph_explore', { query: QUERY });
|
|
response = result.content?.[0]?.text ?? '';
|
|
bytes = attributeSourceBytes(response);
|
|
}, 120_000);
|
|
|
|
afterAll(() => {
|
|
if (cg) cg.destroy();
|
|
if (testDir && fs.existsSync(testDir)) fs.rmSync(testDir, { recursive: true, force: true });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ── 1. Fixture shape ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('fixture shape', () => {
|
|
it('indexes as a Go project with both layers present', () => {
|
|
const files = cg.getFiles().map((f) => f.path);
|
|
expect(files.filter((p) => p.endsWith('.go')).length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(15);
|
|
expect(files.some((p) => p.startsWith(GENERATED_PREFIX))).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(files.some((p) => p.startsWith('internal/usecase/'))).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('flags every generated file and no hand-written one', () => {
|
|
for (const file of cg.getFiles()) {
|
|
expect(file.generated, `${file.path} generated flag`).toBe(
|
|
file.path.startsWith(GENERATED_PREFIX),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('carries generated files that ONLY a content header betrays — the #1500 case', () => {
|
|
// Half the generated tree has ordinary names (`payslip.go`, `store.go`).
|
|
// Path-only detection misses them; the CG-5 content check is what catches
|
|
// them. Without these the fixture would be a .pb.go fixture, not a #1500 one.
|
|
const contentOnly = [
|
|
'internal/gen/fkit/payroll/payslip.go',
|
|
'internal/gen/fkit/payroll/payroll_cycle.go',
|
|
'internal/gen/fkit/payroll/store.go',
|
|
'internal/gen/fkit/payroll/calculate.go',
|
|
'internal/gen/fkit/payroll/dto.go',
|
|
'internal/gen/fkit/employee/employee.go',
|
|
'internal/gen/fkit/timesheet/timesheet.go',
|
|
];
|
|
for (const rel of contentOnly) {
|
|
const source = fs.readFileSync(path.join(testDir, rel), 'utf-8');
|
|
expect(isGeneratedFile(rel), `${rel} must NOT be detectable by path`).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(hasGeneratedHeader(source), `${rel} must be detectable by header`).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(cg.getFile(rel)?.generated, `${rel} indexed flag`).toBe(true);
|
|
}
|
|
// …beside the conventional path-detectable ones, so both channels are covered.
|
|
expect(isGeneratedFile('internal/gen/payrollpb/payroll.pb.go')).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('collides the generated layer with the hand-written one by name', () => {
|
|
// A naive scorer sees two BuildPayslips and two Upserts and has no reason
|
|
// to prefer the one that implements the business rule.
|
|
for (const name of ['BuildPayslip', 'Upsert', 'Store']) {
|
|
const files = new Set(cg.getNodesByName(name).map((n) => n.filePath));
|
|
expect([...files].some((p) => p.startsWith(GENERATED_PREFIX)), `${name} generated`).toBe(true);
|
|
expect([...files].some((p) => !p.startsWith(GENERATED_PREFIX)), `${name} hand-written`).toBe(true);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('resolves the hand-written workflow chain end-to-end in the graph', () => {
|
|
const calleesOf = (name: string, file: string) => {
|
|
const node = cg.getNodesByName(name).find((n) => n.filePath === file);
|
|
expect(node, `${name} in ${file}`).toBeTruthy();
|
|
return cg
|
|
.getOutgoingEdges(node!.id)
|
|
.filter((e) => e.kind === 'calls')
|
|
.map((e) => cg.getNode(e.target))
|
|
.filter((n): n is NonNullable<typeof n> => !!n);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// handler → use-case
|
|
expect(
|
|
calleesOf('RunCycle', 'internal/transport/httpapi/payroll_handler.go')
|
|
.some((n) => n.name === 'RunCycle' && n.filePath === 'internal/usecase/payroll/cycle.go'),
|
|
).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
// use-case → the workflow
|
|
expect(
|
|
calleesOf('RunCycle', 'internal/usecase/payroll/cycle.go')
|
|
.some((n) => n.name === 'runPayrollCycleAll'),
|
|
).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
// the workflow → build + persist
|
|
const workflow = calleesOf('runPayrollCycleAll', 'internal/usecase/payroll/cycle.go');
|
|
expect(
|
|
workflow.some((n) => n.name === 'BuildPayslip' && n.filePath === 'internal/usecase/payroll/payslip_builder.go'),
|
|
'runPayrollCycleAll must reach the hand-written BuildPayslip',
|
|
).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(workflow.some((n) => n.name === 'Upsert'), 'runPayrollCycleAll must reach an Upsert').toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('routes an HTTP entry point into the workflow', () => {
|
|
const router = cg.getNodesInFile('internal/transport/httpapi/router.go');
|
|
expect(router.some((n) => n.kind === 'route' || n.name === 'NewRouter')).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('sizes the two layers so the size-driven render split actually bites', () => {
|
|
// The mechanism the epic is about: a small file ships WHOLE, a large one
|
|
// falls through to clipped clusters. The workflow file must stay above the
|
|
// whole-file window and the generated files below it, or the fixture stops
|
|
// reproducing anything.
|
|
const lines = (rel: string) => fs.readFileSync(path.join(testDir, rel), 'utf-8').split('\n').length;
|
|
expect(lines('internal/usecase/payroll/cycle.go')).toBeGreaterThan(220);
|
|
for (const rel of ['internal/gen/fkit/payroll/payslip.go', 'internal/gen/fkit/payroll/payroll_cycle.go']) {
|
|
expect(lines(rel)).toBeLessThan(220);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('answers the query at all', () => {
|
|
expect(response.length).toBeGreaterThan(1000);
|
|
expect(bytes.size).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ── 2. Budget allocation — the open bug ───────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('budget allocation', () => {
|
|
const share = (predicate: (p: string) => boolean) => {
|
|
let total = 0;
|
|
for (const [file, n] of bytes) if (predicate(file)) total += n;
|
|
return total / response.length;
|
|
};
|
|
const answerShare = () => share((p) => startsWithAny(p, ANSWER_PREFIXES));
|
|
const generatedShare = () => share((p) => p.startsWith(GENERATED_PREFIX));
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* BASELINE 2026-08-03 (very-tiny tier, 13,000-char budget): 23,020 chars
|
|
* allocated against it, cut to 16,011 by the 19,500 hard ceiling. The
|
|
* generated CRUD delivers 57.4%; the hand-written layer delivers 25.6%, all
|
|
* of it domain types. `cycle.go` is allocated the single largest slice
|
|
* (7,052 chars, 30.6%) and delivers ZERO — the ceiling drops its whole
|
|
* section — so runPayrollCycleAll, the hand-written BuildPayslip and the
|
|
* real Upsert never reach the agent at all.
|
|
*
|
|
* Each `it.fails` below passes ONLY while that is still true.
|
|
* ⚠ When one goes red, the bug is fixed: remove `.fails`, keep the test.
|
|
*/
|
|
it.fails('CG-12 GATE: concentrates the envelope on the hand-written workflow', () => {
|
|
expect(answerShare()).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0.55);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it.fails('CG-12 GATE: does not spend the envelope on the generated CRUD', () => {
|
|
expect(generatedShare()).toBeLessThanOrEqual(0.25);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it.fails('CG-12 GATE: delivers the workflow file it allocated the most bytes to', () => {
|
|
expect(bytes.get('internal/usecase/payroll/cycle.go') ?? 0).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it.fails('CG-12 GATE: delivers the calculation the question asks about', () => {
|
|
expect(bytes.get('internal/usecase/payroll/payslip_builder.go') ?? 0).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it.fails('CG-12 GATE: puts the hand-written chain in the response, not its generated twin', () => {
|
|
// Bare `BuildPayslip`/`Upsert` also match the generated collisions — these
|
|
// needles are unique to the hand-written chain.
|
|
expect(response).toContain('runPayrollCycleAll');
|
|
expect(response).toContain('func (s *Service) BuildPayslip');
|
|
expect(response).toContain('s.store.Upsert(ctx, slip)');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('records the shape of the failure so a regression is legible', () => {
|
|
// Not a gate — an assertion-free-ish snapshot of WHY the gates above fail,
|
|
// so a future change that shifts the numbers shows up in the diff rather
|
|
// than silently flipping an it.fails.
|
|
const generated = generatedShare();
|
|
const answer = answerShare();
|
|
const workflow = bytes.get('internal/usecase/payroll/cycle.go') ?? 0;
|
|
expect({
|
|
generatedWinsEnvelope: generated > answer,
|
|
workflowFileDeliversNothing: workflow === 0,
|
|
}).toEqual({
|
|
generatedWinsEnvelope: true,
|
|
workflowFileDeliversNothing: true,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|