CG-27 asked whether the >50%-of-file envelope drop should cover `function` /
`method`, so a `createFoo()` factory returning an object of closures stops
merging every closure inside it into one cluster. Measured on a hermetic
fixture, it should not, and the issue is closed as obsolete with CG-30 credited.
Two mechanisms already absorb the shape. shrinkCluster orders members by
(importance desc, size ASC) and refuses any member that overruns the cap once
something is kept, so a file-spanning member is only selected when it is the
sole member of the top importance tier — eight of nine query shapes never
selected it at all. When it IS selected, CG-30 windows it on whole lines, so
the file still delivers bounded, readable source (6 of 9 closure definitions
in that configuration).
Dropping the range instead SPLITS the file, and only the first-chosen cluster
may be shrunk: a trivial 7-line cluster won the density tiebreak and the
answer-bearing cluster was dropped whole — rank-#1 file 7,539 chars and 7 of 11
closures to 397 and none. Reaching the same intent more carefully (defer the
envelope MEMBER inside shrinkCluster, leaving clustering untouched) is noise:
69 vs 68 closure definitions across nine query shapes. Nothing shipped.
Adds the fixture, the probe, a standing gate on the outcome, and the record —
including a real defect the measurement exposed on the epic tip: django's
query.py leaves 8,212 of 10,135 unspent and drops a score-290 cluster to keep a
score-14 one. Filed separately.
No behaviour change, so no CHANGELOG entry.
Colby McHenry
91cb5b4317