9 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Colby McHenryandClaude Opus 5 c65d56ceba docs: CG-22 — the epic's gate, re-run at CG-15's exact setup (#1500)
CG-21 fixed the unspent-reservation defect and re-ran the A/B itself. CG-22 is
the gate proper: CG-15's setup, unchanged, measured independently of the task
that wrote the fix. RUNS=3, both arms codegraph-on, sonnet/high,
CODEGRAPH_NO_PROMPT_HOOK=1 on both, baseline pinned to 49c11fc by SHA, fresh
clones of the same three repos and the same three questions.

All four bars pass. Read = 0 in all 12 new-arm runs (express 3, excalidraw 3,
client-go 6) while the baseline reads in 3 of 3 express runs and 1 of 6
client-go runs; the express run that failed CG-15 with 4 Reads of lib/utils.js
now reads nothing and receives the file whole. Answer share >= 66.6% in every
new run. Medians: express 26s -> 24s, excalidraw 26s -> 26s, client-go
35s -> 36.5s at n=6 with fully overlapping ranges.

Deterministic core re-measured on BOTH builds in one session rather than
quoted: lib/utils.js renders whole at 6,380 B on baseline and on HEAD (583 B
stub under CG-12), and the source envelope goes 13,849 -> 14,913 against an
unchanged 13,000 budget, so the reservation is spent and the envelope stops
shrinking. client-go's +1.5s median is attributed away from the build: explore
latency 669 vs 668 ms (n=5) and the new build's deterministic response is both
smaller (15.8K vs 18.9K) and more concentrated (top file 50.2% vs 35.7%).

Two counter-points recorded as measured, not smoothed: excalidraw's new arm
runs below its baseline on answer share (66.6-81.9 vs 75.5-92.7, all well over
the bar), and this session's client-go baseline sampled well (85.6-100%), so
the #1500 gap is smaller here than in CG-21's session.

CHANGELOG: the two #1500 bullets were multi-sentence paragraphs carrying
implementation detail. Rewritten to house style as four bullets that lead with
the symptom, with the mechanism, the banner catalogue and the old-behaviour
contrast dropped; the @LeDuyViet credit and the re-index note stay.

Suite green on the measured build: 171 files, 2,868 passed, 6 skipped.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 12:58:26 -05:00
Colby McHenry abee46c5e4 docs: CG-21 A/B — the gate passes, all four bars (#1500)
Re-runs CG-15's agent A/B on the fixed build: same harness, same three
prompts, same baseline ref, n=6 per arm on express and excalidraw.

Read = 0 in all 15 new-arm runs. The express regression that routed the
defect to CG-21 does not reproduce in 6 attempts, and the baseline now
reads in 4 of 6 while the new arm reads in none (median 24.5s -> 21.5s),
so the control beats the arm it previously lost to. client-go holds
92.7-96.2% answer share against a baseline run at 53.8%.

Excalidraw's new arm is ~8s slower at the median and that is recorded as
NOT attributable to the build rather than waved through: explore's own
latency is 374ms vs 372ms on the same query and index, the deterministic
responses differ by +2% with one byte-identical, and the unchanged main
build's own median moved 34s -> 26.5s between the two sessions — the same
magnitude as the gap.

Bars were not re-baselined; they are CG-15's four, applied to a larger
sample. The CG-15 section is kept intact and marked superseded, because
its root-cause analysis is the record of why the fix looks like it does.
2026-08-04 02:40:10 -05:00
Colby McHenry 51cd053d85 docs: CG-21 — spending the reservation (design record + CHANGELOG precision)
Records both levers, the funding-pool design (and the per-file version that
dropped payslip_builder.go), the resolved memory-budget.ts exception, and the
two hermetic fixtures with their mutation matrix.

The CHANGELOG clause 'no longer trimmed while a smaller, weakly-related one is
included whole' was imprecise after CG-21: the smaller file often IS still
included whole now, when its share nearly covers it. Reworded to say what the
fix actually guarantees.
2026-08-04 02:17:28 -05:00
Colby McHenryandClaude Opus 5 c7103c7f2f docs: CG-15 agent A/B of the #1500 allocation change — gate fails on the control
Three repos, both arms codegraph-on, sonnet/high, 3 runs per arm.

PASS on the two medium repos: client-go (the reporter's Go shape, 2,001 of
2,454 files generated) and excalidraw hold Read 0 in every run of both arms,
excalidraw goes 34s -> 24s at the median with one fewer explore call, and the
generated clientsets/informers that took 10.5%% of a baseline envelope appear
in no new run.

FAIL on express, the small control, in 1 run of 3: 4 Reads and 52s against a
baseline that read once. Not agent variance — replaying that run's query
deterministically, lib/utils.js goes from 6,380 bytes whole to a 583-byte
cluster stub and the envelope shrinks 13.8K -> 9.2K against an unchanged
13,000 budget. The diagnostic shows the allocator was right and the render
loop was not: utils.js is the top-ranked file, was reserved 3,870 chars, and
spent 583. The whole-file bound (allowance + grace = 4,450) lands just under
the file's 5,293 bytes, so the whole-file render is declined and the unspent
reservation is dropped rather than redistributed.

Bar 1 is the hard gate, so per CG-15's acceptance rule the design goes back to
CG-12 — the budget is not to be widened to compensate. Two candidate fixes are
written up in the design doc.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 01:26:47 -05:00
Colby McHenryandClaude Opus 5 1d9206d2d0 test(explore): lock down proportional byte allocation (CG-14, #1500)
Coverage for the CG-12 allocator, built around "would this go red if the
lever were removed" rather than line coverage — every way this regresses
is silent, ending in an agent falling back to Read.

Unit (`explore-proportional-allocation.test.ts`, 18 -> 38): calibration
pins, envelope safety across every tier and 30 candidate shapes, the
cliff boundary, spine weighting/trim survival, the diffuse control, and
the degenerate inputs — identical scores, a lone file, a runaway top
scorer, zero results, maxFiles 0, a non-finite score.

End-to-end (`explore-allocation-e2e.test.ts`, new): CG-6's second
regression fixture as a deterministic synthetic mirror — a large relevant
file, a small helper that used to win by shipping whole, and an
incidental `explore`/`BUDGET` collision — asserting per-file budget
share, not file presence. Plus degenerate result sets and a survey-style
diffuse control through the real render loop. The live self-query arm
stays in probe-allocation.mjs, where drift is a number to re-baseline
rather than a red suite.

Reverting the render loop to the pre-CG-12 rules reproduces #1500 on the
mirror exactly and takes 5 e2e + 2 payroll gates red:

  file                     score  pre-CG-12       CG-12
  src/mcp/allocator.ts      77.5  4,843 (39.7%)   9,335 (80.1%)
  src/util/budget-math.ts   36.0  6,079 (49.8%)   1,037 ( 8.9%)

Two defects the invariants surfaced, both fixed in tools.ts:
- rounded shares could sum past `pool`, so "reservations fit the
  envelope" was approximate rather than exact; both terms now floor
- a non-finite score made every share Infinity/Infinity, handing the
  render loop a NaN allowance; `weightOf` now fails safe to 0

Also adds a hard-ceiling gate to the payroll fixture — at 19.3K against
a 19.5K ceiling it is the only fixture that stresses the ~25K inline cap
— and exports EXPLORE_ALLOCATION so invariant tests read the constants
while one test pins the literals.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 00:56:50 -05:00
Colby McHenryandClaude Opus 5 5f7f5f59df feat(mcp): score-proportional byte allocation for explore, with a relative cliff (CG-12, #1500)
The explore envelope used to follow FILE SIZE, not relevance. Every admitted
file was capped at the same flat `maxCharsPerFile`, while the whole-file rule
handed anything under `maxCharsPerFile * 3` its entire contents — a 3x swing
decided by how big a file happened to be:

  - self-query: `memory-budget.ts` (score 18) shipped whole and took 51.2% of
    the response; `src/mcp/tools.ts` (score 41, 4x the graph mass, 3x the term
    hits — it holds the allocator itself) was clipped at 3,800 and got 32.9%.
  - #1500 Go fixture: two generated CRUD files shipped whole at ~4.5K each AND
    consumed two of the tier's four file slots, so `BuildPayslip` — the
    hand-written "calculate" half of the question — ranked #6 and never
    rendered at all.

`allocateExploreBudget` now reserves each ranked file a share of the envelope
before anything renders, so the render loop spends a reservation instead of
racing for whatever the files above it left:

  - weight = score x worth x (spine ? 2 : 1), where `worth` is `rankPenalty`
    applied a SECOND time — ranking answers "is this file about the query",
    allocation answers "will these bytes teach the agent anything", and
    generated CRUD can legitimately rank while its bytes stay boilerplate;
  - a relative cliff at 15% of the top weight (capped at SCORE_FLOOR_MAX, so a
    god-file can't silence peers the score floor just admitted) gives a file
    ZERO source — path, symbols and line numbers only — and crucially frees its
    `maxFiles` slot for a file that earns its bytes;
  - every admitted file gets MIN_CHARS, then the remainder splits by weight:
    the floor keeps a diffuse survey question returning a spread, the remainder
    concentrates a precise one;
  - the flat per-file cap is retired as the primary guard, leaving a 70%-of-
    envelope safety valve.

Two changes were needed to make the reservation bite: an oversize cluster now
shrinks by whole MEMBER symbol ranges (a single-cluster god-file previously
took ~40% more than allotted, and the file below it was dropped for lack of
room), and the arrival-order budget stops are gone — they cut files by the
order they were reached rather than by merit.

Measured: payroll-go answer group 25.6% -> 78.7%, generated 57.4% -> 0%, and
`func (s *Service) BuildPayslip` now delivered; self-query `tools.ts` 18.5% ->
60.6%, past the epic's >50% bar. Controls hold: cobra/gin diffuse survey
queries keep their file spread (3->3, 3->4), express's middleware query is
byte-identical, and gin's flow query moves its top file from the thin `ginS`
singleton wrapper to `routergroup.go`.

One documented exception to "no previously-unclipped file becomes clipped":
`memory-budget.ts` was unclipped-whole at 5,672 and now clusters within its
3.1K reservation. That is the epic's own diagnosis of the bug — it scored 18
against 58 and was taking the larger slice purely for being small.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 00:37:17 -05:00
Colby McHenryandClaude Opus 5 a3898cdc70 feat(mcp): relevance scoring overhaul for explore — kill incidental name-collision matches (CG-10, #1500)
Explore's per-file relevance awarded +50/+10/+3/+1 by match class and admitted
anything scoring >= 3. Neither half held up: the tier said HOW a symbol reached
us, never whether the match was evidence, and an absolute floor admits noise on
any repo where the top file scores 50+. Three scripts/agent-eval/*.mjs harnesses
took 63% of this repo's own "how does explore allocate its output budget" answer
on nothing but an unused `const explore` and a `const BUDGET`.

Four levers:

- KIND WEIGHT (RELEVANCE_KIND_WEIGHT): callables and types 1.0, members ~0.5,
  variable/constant/parameter 0.15-0.35. A weak-kind symbol with no usage edge
  anywhere in the graph (`contains` excluded — nesting is not usage) drops to
  0.08. Only weak kinds in the top two tiers pay for the DB probe; the subgraph's
  own edges answer most cases free. No measurable latency change (210 vs 211
  ms/call, n=12 interleaved).

- PERIPHERAL CAP: nodes >=2 hops from any match accumulate into a bucket capped
  at 5. Uncapped they added a flat +1 each, so a file grew more relevant by being
  bigger — parse-session.mjs reached 22 off one constant plus twelve unrelated
  symbols.

- RANK PENALTY: generated files x0.3, low-value x0.5, applied to the score AND
  the graph mass. Score alone would not have fixed #1500 — the generated CRUD
  carries MORE graph mass than the hand-written use-case, and graph mass outranks
  score in the comparator. Self-normalizing, never a hard exclusion.

- RELATIVE FLOOR: clamp(topScore * 0.2, 1, 10). Capped at one full-strength
  direct match so concentration elsewhere can never exclude one (without it a
  named-seed-heavy file pushed the floor to 21 and dropped a file the agent had
  named by class name). Backfills to 3 candidates when it would leave fewer, and
  drops the evidence requirement rather than return nothing at all.

excludeLowValueFiles was dead config — declared per tier, read nowhere; the
test/spec exclusion has been unconditional for a while. Removed. The real gap was
the detector: `isLowValue` anchored on a leading `/`, so a repo-ROOT `test/` dir
(express, cobra, most of npm and Go) never matched — express's routing question
spent 59% of its envelope on three test files. Anchored at `^` too, and the
filter now runs before the floor and judges "are there other candidates?" on the
whole gather.

Measured before/after on the same indexes (baseline bd86ad2):
- payroll-go fixture: generated 57.4% -> 23.5%; answer 25.6% -> 61.5%; cycle.go
  delivered 0 -> 38.9%. Generated ranks #3/#4, was #1/#2.
- self-query fixture: eval scripts 72% -> 0%; tools.ts ranks #1.
- express "route a request": 59% to test/* -> lib/application.js + lib/response.js
- cobra x3, codegraph "indexing pipeline": byte-identical (control)

Diagnostic gains a per-file penalty multiplier and NodeKind mix, so "why did this
file score X" is legible. Selection stages reordered to match the pipeline.

CG-6's gates flip from it.fails to live regressions except the byte-split ones,
which stay open for CG-12 (allocation still follows file size within the ranked
set).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 00:02:45 -05:00
Colby McHenryandClaude Opus 5 bd86ad2061 test(explore): #1500 regression fixtures for budget allocation (CG-6)
Two permanent fixtures pinning the failure mode from issue #1500 — explore
spending its byte envelope on files that merely name-collide with the query.
BOTH FAIL TODAY, by design: they document the bug and become the pass gate
for CG-10 (scoring) + CG-12 (proportional allocation).

__tests__/fixtures/payroll-go/ — a synthetic Go service mirroring the
reporter's shape: generated FKIT CRUD beside a hand-written payroll use-case,
entered from an HTTP route. Half the generated tree carries ORDINARY names
detectable only by their `// Code generated ... DO NOT EDIT.` header (the
#1500 case, and end-to-end cover for CG-5); `payrollpb/*.pb.go` covers the
path-detectable channel. BuildPayslip, Upsert and Store each exist twice,
generated and hand-written. cycle.go sits above the whole-file window so it
clips; the generated files sit below it so they ship whole.

Asking "how does payroll cycle create and calculate payslips?" — naming none
of the answering symbols — the generated CRUD delivers 57.4% of the envelope
against the hand-written layer's 25.6%, all of the latter domain types.
cycle.go is allocated the single largest slice (30.6%) and delivers ZERO: the
hard ceiling drops its whole section. runPayrollCycleAll, the hand-written
BuildPayslip and the real Upsert never reach the agent.

The second fixture is this repo, "how does explore allocate its output budget
across files", where scripts/agent-eval/*.mjs take 71.8% against tools.ts's
18.5% despite scoring 4.6x lower. It reads the live index, so its assertions
are relative rather than fixed percentages.

- scripts/agent-eval/probe-allocation.mjs — per-file budget-share probe,
  driving the CG-4 diagnostic through a JSONL sidecar so it measures the
  shipping allocator. Fixture entries are hermetic (copy + re-index per run,
  verified byte-identical across runs); exits 1 while any assertion fails.
- scripts/agent-eval/allocation-fixtures.json — both fixtures declared, with
  the 2026-08-03 baselines.
- __tests__/explore-allocation-1500.test.ts — fixture-shape assertions green
  today; the allocation assertions held as `it.fails` so the suite stays green
  while the bug is open and goes RED the moment it is fixed.

Also documented and deliberately left unfixed: runPayrollCycleAll's
`s.store.Upsert` edge resolves to the GENERATED Store.Upsert, not the
hand-written one — same-name method resolution across two packages picks the
wrong receiver. It is upstream of the allocation bug, so it belongs with
CG-10's scoring work.

Refs #1500

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-03 23:30:17 -05:00
Colby McHenryandClaude Opus 5 b37f191f5a feat(mcp): per-file allocation diagnostic for explore (CG-4)
How codegraph_explore divides its byte envelope among files was
unobservable — you could read a response and guess, but not say "this
file took 16% and that one took 20%." Nothing else in the budget-
allocation epic is measurable without that.

CODEGRAPH_EXPLORE_DEBUG now emits one report per explore call (stderr
table, stderr JSON, or a JSONL sidecar path). Per file: relevance score,
graph mass, term hits, ranking flags, render mode, bytes allocated vs
delivered, both shares, and whether it was clipped — plus why a ranked
candidate never rendered. Totals cover envelope vs maxOutputChars vs the
hard ceiling, the source/meta split, the selection funnel, and the score
floor and relevance-gate thresholds applied.

Allocated and delivered are reported separately on purpose: they diverge
exactly when the 25K ceiling truncates, and conflating them is how a
dropped trailing file goes unnoticed.

Off by default and byte-identical when off — it ships in the product
binary, and a diagnostic that perturbs the response by one byte would
invalidate every A/B taken with it on. ExploreDiagnostics.start() returns
null unless the env var is set, so every call site is a `diag?.` no-op.

Baseline recorded in docs/design/explore-budget-allocation.md: on this
repo, src/mcp/tools.ts gets 15.8% of the envelope while three weakly-
relevant agent-eval scripts take 61% between them — despite tools.ts
carrying 5.4x the score and 2.6x the graph mass of any of them. Small
files ship whole; the large answer file is clipped at maxCharsPerFile.
Rank ordering is correct and buys nothing. The loop also allocated 23,193
chars against an 18,000 budget.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-03 22:51:18 -05:00