fix(swift): resolve chained static-factory/fluent calls + nested-extension naming (#750) (#755)

Completes Swift in the #750 chained-call series (after Java #751, Kotlin #752,
C# #753, conformance #754). Two parts:

1. Swift chained-call resolution (the #645/#608 mechanism): capture Swift return
   types (positional, member types -> last segment), encode capitalized-receiver
   chains `Foo.make().draw()` / `Foo(args).draw()`, resolve+validate via the
   shared matchDottedCallChain (+ constructor branch). Fixes the decoy wrong-edge
   bug where a chained method dropped to a bare name and attached to a same-named
   method on an unrelated class.

2. Nested-type extension naming fix: `extension KF.Builder: KFOptionSetter` parsed
   as a class_declaration named `KF.Builder` (dot) — inconsistent with the type's
   own declaration `KF::Builder` (name `Builder`) — so the extension's conformances
   and members were invisible to a chained call on the type. A Swift resolveName
   now names a nested-type extension by its last segment (`Builder`), so its
   `implements`/`extends` edges and methods are found by the supertype walk
   (conformance #754) and the simple-name method match.

Validated: synthetic decoy + args + constructor + absent-method tests; full suite
green; nested-extension repro (`KF.url().onSuccess()` resolves via conformance to
the protocol method). Real-repo A/B vs main (conformance) — Alamofire and
Kingfisher both **0 added / 0 removed, node count unchanged**: NEUTRAL and SAFE.
The prior -168 Kingfisher regression (from the naming inconsistency) is eliminated;
Swift's unique-named fluent methods already resolved by bare name, so the chain
path lands the same edges — the value here is decoy-collision correctness, the
nested-extension naming fix, and consistency with the other four languages.
EXTRACTION_VERSION 9 -> 10.

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ and adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html).
 ### Fixes
 
 - Chained method calls now resolve when the chained method is **inherited from a superclass or declared on an interface/protocol** the receiver's type conforms to — for example a call on a sealed-subclass instance (`Either.Right(x).combine(...)`) that invokes a method defined on its parent type. Previously these chains found no caller edge even though the factory's type was known, so the call was invisible to callers, impact, and trace. CodeGraph now walks the type's supertypes (its `extends` / `implements` relationships) to find the method, creating the edge only when a supertype genuinely declares it (so a wrong inference still produces no edge). This makes Java, Kotlin, and C# factory and fluent chains more complete. Existing indexes should be re-indexed (`codegraph index -f`) to benefit. (#750)
+- Swift method calls made through a static factory, fluent chain, or constructor now resolve to the correct class. A call like `Foo.make().draw()` or `Foo().draw()` used to drop the receiver, so the chained method silently attached to a same-named method on an unrelated class — or didn't resolve at all. CodeGraph now captures Swift return types and infers the chained receiver's type from what the inner call returns (or the constructed type), creating the edge only when that class genuinely has the method (so a wrong inference produces no edge instead of a misleading one). Existing Swift indexes should be re-indexed (`codegraph index -f`) to benefit. (#750) (Swift)
 - C# method calls made through a static factory or fluent chain now resolve to the correct class. A call like `Foo.Create().Bar()` or `JObject.Parse(s).Property(...)` used to lose the receiver's type, so the chained method didn't resolve and the call was invisible to callers/impact/trace. CodeGraph now captures C# return types and infers the chained receiver's type from what the inner call returns, creating the edge only when that class genuinely has the method (so a wrong inference produces no edge). Existing C# indexes should be re-indexed (`codegraph index -f`) to benefit. (#750) (C#)
 - Kotlin method calls made through a companion-object factory or fluent chain now resolve to the correct class. A call like `Foo.getInstance().bar()` or `Config.create(opts).build()` used to drop the receiver entirely, so the chained method silently attached to a same-named method on an unrelated class — or didn't resolve at all — corrupting callers, impact, and trace. CodeGraph now captures Kotlin return types and infers the chained receiver's type from what the inner call returns, creating the edge only when that class genuinely has the method (so a wrong inference produces no edge instead of a misleading one). Existing Kotlin indexes should be re-indexed (`codegraph index -f`) to benefit. (#750) (Kotlin)
 - Java method calls made through a static factory or fluent chain now resolve to the correct class. A call like `Foo.getInstance().bar()` or `Config.create(opts).build()` used to lose the receiver's type, so when two classes had a same-named method the call silently attached to whichever was indexed first — or didn't resolve at all — corrupting callers, impact, and trace. CodeGraph now captures Java return types and infers the chained receiver's type from what the inner call returns, creating the edge only when that class genuinely has the method (so a wrong inference produces no edge instead of a misleading one). Covers factories and fluent builders that take arguments (`hashKeys().arrayListValues()`), including builders that return a nested type. Existing Java indexes should be re-indexed (`codegraph index -f`) to benefit. (#750) (Java)