fix(explore): keep multi-term backend files from being buried by a denser frontend layer
codegraph_explore's file sort is primarily driven by Random-Walk-with-Restart graph-centrality mass, seeded from the query's text matches. In a cross-layer monorepo (an API server alongside a much larger, internally dense frontend that mirrors the same domain words), that mass skews to the bigger layer — so a backend service/handler that genuinely matches several query terms, even when it's the #1 search hit, sorts below hits=0 frontend files and gets truncated out of the response, and the agent reads it back. Add a corroboration tier above the graph signal: a file that is BOTH an entry/central file AND matched by >=2 distinct query terms is kept in. The entry/central guard prevents an incidental multi-term file (a type/util file that isn't the flow) from displacing a graph-central answer file — a blunt hits-only tier regressed that case. Single-layer repos are unaffected. Gated by CODEGRAPH_RANK_NO_MULTITERM=1. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 4.8
parent
f34f606342
commit
798cd0e21c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ and adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html).
|
||||
|
||||
### New Features
|
||||
|
||||
- `codegraph_explore` now surfaces the right code in large multi-layer projects. When you ask a backend-flow question in a repo that pairs an API server with a big frontend that mirrors the same domain words — say an `app/` admin UI sitting over an `api/` server — the server-side file that genuinely matches several of your query's terms is no longer pushed out of the results by the larger, more interconnected frontend layer. A file corroborated by two or more distinct query terms is now kept in the answer even when a denser unrelated layer would otherwise crowd it out, so "how does X read items / handle the request" returns the service or handler that does the work instead of a wall of frontend views. Single-layer projects are unaffected; set `CODEGRAPH_RANK_NO_MULTITERM=1` to revert to the previous ranking.
|
||||
- Impact and blast-radius analysis for TypeScript, JavaScript, Go, Python, Rust, Ruby, C, Java, C#, PHP, Scala, Kotlin, Swift, Dart, and Pascal/Delphi now understands the readers of a constant. When you change a file-scope, package-level, module-level, or class-level constant — a config object, a lookup table, a shared constant — the other symbols in that file that read it now show up as affected, where before they were invisible (impact only followed calls, imports, and inheritance, so a constant's consumers looked like "nothing depends on this"). This makes `codegraph impact`, and the impact trail in `codegraph_explore`/`codegraph_node`, catch the "change this table, break its readers" class of change. It's on by default and adds no nodes to your graph; bundled/minified files and ambiguously-shadowed names are skipped to keep results precise. Set `CODEGRAPH_VALUE_REFS=0` to turn it off.
|
||||
- C file-scope constants and globals — `static const` scalars, pointer/array lookup tables, and shared mutable globals — are now recognized as symbols in their own right. They previously weren't extracted at all, so they never appeared in search or carried any dependents; now they show up in `codegraph search` and participate in impact analysis (see above), so changing a C lookup table surfaces the same-file functions that read it.
|
||||
- Java `static final` constants, C# `const` / `static readonly` constants, Scala `object` vals, and Kotlin top-level / `object` / `companion object` `val`s are now classified as constants rather than generic fields, so they participate in the constant-reader impact analysis above — change a `public static final` table, a `const string`, a Scala `object Config { val Timeout = … }`, or a Kotlin `companion object { const val … }` and the methods that read it now show up as affected. (Per-object Java `final` / C# `readonly` / Scala & Kotlin `class` instance properties are unchanged.) Kotlin constants were previously not indexed as their own symbols at all, so they now also appear in `codegraph search`.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user