feat(ui): saved trails — a walk you named, kept, and still true after a re-index (CG-60)
Save trail on the trail bar writes the walk to .codegraph/ui/trails/ as one JSON file, listed on the empty screen and on Entry points above the derived suggestions, reopened at the symbol you left with the whole path restored. A hop is stored by qualified name, kind and file — never by node id, which contains a start line and so changes the first time anybody edits above the symbol. Every hop is re-resolved against the current index on the way out and each row says what became of it: still here, moved to another file, now ambiguous, or gone. A hole is never stitched over: the row opens the longest run of CONSECUTIVE resolved hops and says which ones those are, because the trail is a path and a skipped hop would draw a call that does not exist. This is the first write the viewer makes, and the boundary moved with it: POST/DELETE answer under /api/ only, must carry X-CodeGraph-UI and application/json (neither of which a cross-origin form can produce without a preflight this server answers none of), and --read-only refuses both while still listing what is there. The blanket "read-only" claim is retired from the banner, the README, the CLI help and the docs site in favour of the narrower true one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5
parent
55a33055ee
commit
47576b392e
@@ -258,7 +258,10 @@ afterAll(async () => {
|
||||
describe('GET /api', () => {
|
||||
it('lists the endpoints it answers', async () => {
|
||||
const body = await getJson('/api');
|
||||
expect(body.readOnly).toBe(true);
|
||||
// Not a blanket claim any more (CG-60): saved trails are the one thing
|
||||
// this server writes, and it names it rather than implying there is none.
|
||||
expect(body.readOnly).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(body.writes).toEqual(['POST /api/trails', 'DELETE /api/trails/<id>']);
|
||||
const paths = body.endpoints.map((e: any) => e.path);
|
||||
expect(paths).toEqual(
|
||||
expect.arrayContaining([
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user